Expertise Development in Clinical Psychology
نویسندگان
چکیده
This study intends to shed light on expertise development in clinical psychology during university studies and beyond. So far, 70 participants at different stages of training have taken part in the study, ranging from psychology undergraduates to expert therapists. All participants completed a computerbased questionnaire consisting of 3 parts: a knowledge test, open-format questions, and case studies. At the expert level, data collection has not yet been finished, but preliminary results can be reported. Participants from different stages of training levels did not differ regarding knowledge about basic principles. However, with increasing training, participants knew significantly more about the application of basic principles to clinical psychology and about clinical psychology itself. In answering the open-format questions, participants differed significantly regarding their use of technical terms. The case studies revealed differences in terms of the quality of recalled items, the correctness of the diagnosis, and the quality of the explanations given for the patients’ problems. Preliminary results from the sample of expert therapists indicated a decrease in some of these variables.
منابع مشابه
Expertise in Clinical Psychology. The Effects of University Training and Practical Experience on Expertise in Clinical Psychology
How do university training and subsequent practical experience affect expertise in clinical psychology? To answer this question we developed methods to assess psychological knowledge and the competence to diagnose, construct case conceptualizations, and plan psychotherapeutic treatment: a knowledge test and short case studies in a first study, and a complex, dynamically evolving case study in t...
متن کامل“It’s Not Smooth Sailing”: Bridging the Gap Between Methods and Content Expertise in Public Health Guideline Development
Background The development of reliable, high quality health-related guidelines depends on explicit and transparent processes, methods aimed at minimising risks of bias and the inclusion of all relevant expertise and perspectives. While the methodological aspects of guidelines have been a focus to improve their quality, less is known...
متن کاملThe Development of Professional Judgment and Decision Making Expertise in Applied Sport Psychology
This paper establishes current theoretical understanding on the development of professional judgment and decision-making (PJDM) expertise within applied sport psychology (ASP). Traditional and naturalistic paradigms of decision making are contrasted and the resulting blending of systematic analysis and intuition most appropriate for applied practice is explained through the concept of skilled i...
متن کاملThe Effects of Practical Experience on Expertise in Clinical Psychology and Collaboration
Two studies are presented. The first study examined the effects of growing practical experience on expertise in clinical psychology. 85 persons with different amounts of practical experience (novice, intermediate, and advanced students, trainee therapists, and experienced therapists) took part in the study. All participants completed an instrument consisting of a test measuring basic and clinic...
متن کاملClinical reasoning assessment through medical expertise theories: past, present and future directions
Exploration into the concept of "medical expert" dates back to more than 50 years ago, yet yielding three leading theories in the area of clinical reasoning, namely, knowledge structure, hypothetic-deductive, and dual process. Each theory defines “medical expert” in a dissimilar way. Therefore, the methods of assessment through which the experts are identified have been changed during the tim...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006